4.5 Article

Assessment of high speed imaging systems for 2D and 3D deformation measurements: Methodology development and validation

Journal

EXPERIMENTAL MECHANICS
Volume 47, Issue 4, Pages 561-579

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11340-006-9011-y

Keywords

high speed imaging systems; CCD and CMOS; digital image correlation; stereo vision; camera calibration; image distortion and correction; full-field measurement

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ultra high-speed and moderate speed image acquisition platforms have been characterized, with special emphasis on the variability and accuracy of the measurements obtained when employed in either 2D or 3D computer vision systems for deformation and shape measurements. Specifically, the type of image distortions present in both single channel cameras (HS-CMOS) and multi-channel image intensified cameras (UHS-ICCD) are quantified as part of the overall study, and their effect on the accuracy of experimental measurements obtained using digital image correlation have been determined. Results indicate that established methods for noise suppression and recently developed models for distortion correction can be used effectively in situations where the primary intensity noise components are characterized by minimal cross-talk and stationary spatial distortions. Baseline uniaxial tension experiments demonstrate that image correlation measurements using high speed imaging systems are unbiased and consistent with independent deformation measurements over the same length scale, with point-to-point strain variations that are similar to results obtained from translation experiments. In this study, the point-to-point variability in strain using the image intensified system is on the order of 0.001, whereas the non-intensified system had variability of 0.0001. Results confirm that high speed imaging systems can be utilized for full field two and three-dimensional measurements using digital image correlation methods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available