4.6 Article

Low-mass lithium-rich AGB stars in the Galactic bulge: evidence for cool bottom processing?

Journal

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Volume 471, Issue 2, Pages L41-L45

Publisher

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20077879

Keywords

nuclear reactions, nucleosynthesis abundances; stars : AGB and post-AGB; stars : evolution; stars : abundances

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Context. The stellar production of the light element lithium is still a matter of debate. Aims. We report the detection of low-mass, Li-rich Asymptotic Giant Branch (AGB) stars located in the Galactic bulge. Methods. A homogeneous and well-selected sample of low mass, oxygen-rich AGB stars in the Galactic bulge has been searched for the absorption lines of Li. Using spectral synthesis techniques, we determine from high resolution UVES/VLT spectra the Li abundance in four out of 27 sample stars, and an upper limit for the remaining stars. Results. Two stars in our sample have a solar Li abundance or above; these stars seem to be a novelty, since they do not show any s-element enhancement. Two more stars have a Li abundance slightly below solar; these stars do show s-element enhancement in their spectra. Different scenarios which lead to an increased Li surface abundance in AGB stars are discussed. Conclusions. Of the different enrichment scenarios presented, Cool Bottom Processing ( CBP) is the most likely one for the Li-rich objects identified here. Self-enrichment by Hot Bottom Burning (HBB) seems very unlikely as all Li-rich stars are below the HBB mass limit. Also, the ingestion of a low mass companion into the stars' envelope is unlikely because the associated additional effects are lacking. Mass transfer from a former massive binary companion is a possible scenario, if the companion produced little s-process elements. A simple theoretical estimation for the Li abundance due to CBP is presented and compared to the observed values.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available