4.6 Article

The Michigan/MIKE fiber system survey of stellar radial velocities in dwarf spheroidal galaxies: Acquisition and reduction of data

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL SUPPLEMENT SERIES
Volume 171, Issue 2, Pages 389-418

Publisher

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/517886

Keywords

galaxies : dwarf; galaxies : kinematics and dynamics; Local Group; techniques : radial velocities

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We introduce a stellar velocity survey of dwarf spheroidal galaxies, undertaken using the Michigan / MIKE Fiber System ( MMFS) at the Magellan/Clay 6.5 m telescope at Las Campanas Observatory. As of 2006 November we have used MMFS to collect 6415 high-resolution ( R = 20,000-25,000) spectra from 5180 stars in four dwarf spheroidal galaxies: Carina, Fornax, Sculptor, and Sextans. Spectra sample the range 5140-5180 angstrom, which includes the prominent magnesium triplet absorption feature. We measure radial velocity ( RV) to a median precision of 2.0 km s(-1) for stars as faint as V similar to 20.5. From the spectra we also are able to measure the strength of iron and magnesium absorption features using spectral indices that correlate with effective temperature, surface gravity, and chemical abundance. Measurement of line strength allows us to identify interloping foreground stars independently of velocity and to examine the metallicity distribution among dSph members. Here we present detailed descriptions of MMFS, our target selection and spectroscopic observations, the data reduction procedure, and error analysis. We compare our RV results to previously published measurements for individual stars. In some cases we find evidence for a mild, velocity-dependent offset between the RVs that we measure using the magnesium triplet and previously published RV measurements derived from the infrared calcium triplet. In companion papers we will present the complete data sets and kinematic analyses of these new observations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available