4.5 Article

Testosterone regulation of renal cystathionine β-synthase:: implications for sex-dependent differences in plasma homocysteine levels

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-RENAL PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 293, Issue 2, Pages F594-F600

Publisher

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajprenal.00171.2007

Keywords

total homocysteine; S-adenosylmethionine

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL063943, HL-63943] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK-64959] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Elevated plasma total homocysteine ( tHcy) is an independent risk factor for ischemic heart disease and stroke. Epidemiological studies reveal that men have higher tHcy levels than women, but the mechanism underlying this sex- dependent difference is unknown. One route for intracellular disposal of homocysteine is catalyzed by cystathionine beta-synthase ( CBS). Renal function is known to be an important determinant of tHcy, and, in this study, we demonstrate that renal CBS expression and activity in mice diminished approximately twofold after castration, whereas ovariectomization was without effect. The higher renal CBS activity in males ( 22.7 +/- 3.1 mmol cystathionine . h(-1) . kg kidney(-1)) vs. females ( 8.4 +/- 3.4 mmol cystathionine . h(-1) . kg kidney (-1), P . 10(-6)) in C57Bl/ 6J mice was associated with lower plasma tHcy levels in males vs. females, and this difference was exacerbated in Cbs(+/-) mice ( 7.7 +/- 1.9 mu mol/l in males vs. 13.8 +/- 6.4 mu mol/l in females, P = 0.005). Surprisingly, mammals exhibit a diversity of regulatory patterns for kidney CBS, with females exhibiting lower CBS activity in mice, higher in rats and humans, and being indistinguishable from males in rabbit, hamster, and guinea pig. Our data suggest that testosterone- dependent regulation of human CBS in kidney may contribute to sex- dependent differences in homocysteine transsulfuration.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available