4.7 Article

Genome-wide transcriptome profiling of region-specific vulnerability to oxidative stress in the hippocampus

Journal

GENOMICS
Volume 90, Issue 2, Pages 201-212

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2007.03.007

Keywords

hippocampus; CA1; CA3; oxidative stress; inflammation; neurite outgrowth; gene expression profiling

Funding

  1. NIA NIH HHS [P01 AG012993-06A1, P01 AG012993-070009, P01 AG012993-10S1, P01 AG012993-08, AG12993, P01 AG012993-040005, P01 AG012993-050005, P01 AG012993-05, P01 AG012993, P01 AG012993-10, P01 AG012993-09, P01 AG012993-030005, P01 AG012993-06A10009, P01 AG012993-07] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NICHD NIH HHS [HD02528, P30 HD002528] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Neurons in the hippocampal CA1 region are particularly sensitive to oxidative stress (OS), whereas those in CA3 are resistant. To uncover mechanisms for selective CA1 vulnerability to OS, we treated organotypic hippocampal slices with duroquinone and compared transcriptional profiles of CA1 vs CA3 cells at various intervals. Gene Ontology and Biological Pathway analyses of differentially expressed genes showed that at all time points, CA1 had higher transcriptional activity for stress/inflammatory response, transition metal transport, ferroxidase, and presynaptic signaling activity, while CA3 had higher GABA-signaling, postsynaptic, and calcium and potassium channel activity. Real-time PCR and immunoblots confirmed the transcriptome data and the induction of OS by duroquinone in both hippocampal regions. Our functional genomics approach has identified in CAI cells molecular pathways as well as unique genes, such as guanosine deaminase, lipocalin 2, synaptotagmin 4, and latrophilin 2, whose time-dependent induction following the initiation of OS may represent attempts at neurite outgrowth, synaptic recovery, and resistance against OS. (c) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available