4.7 Article

Isotopic fractionation of mercury induced by reduction and ethylation

Journal

ANALYTICAL AND BIOANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 393, Issue 1, Pages 377-385

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00216-008-2348-6

Keywords

Isotope ratios; Multicollector inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Mass-independent fractionation; Isotopic fractionation; Mercury reduction; Mercury ethylation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Isotope ratio measurements characterizing Hg-202/Hg-200 in NIST SRM 3133 Mercury Standard Solution were undertaken by multicollector inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry employing NIST SRM 997 Tl for mass bias correction by use of the slope and the intercept obtained from a natural logarithmic plot of each session of measurements of Hg-202/Hg-200 against Tl-205/Tl-203. The calculated value of 1.285333 +/- 0.000192 (mean and one standard deviation, n=40) for the mass bias corrected Hg-202/Hg-200 was then used for mass bias correction of other Hg isotope pairs. Ratios of 0.015337 +/- 0.000011, 1.68770 +/- 0.00054, 2.3056 +/- 0.0015, 1.3129 +/- 0.0013, 2.9634 +/- 0.0038, and 0.67937 +/- 0.0013 (expanded uncertainty, k=2) were obtained for Hg-196/Hg-198, Hg-199/Hg-198, Hg-200/Hg-198, Hg-201/Hg-198, Hg-202/Hg-198, and Hg-204/Hg-198, respectively. Reduction of Hg(II) to Hg-0 in solutions of SRM 3133 was then undertaken using SnCl2, NaBH4, UV photolysis in the presence of formic acid, and ethylation of Hg( II) using NaBEt4. These reactions induced significant isotope fractionation with maximum values of 1.17 +/- 0.07, 1.08 +/- 0.09, 1.34 +/- 0.07, and 3.59 +/- 0.09% (one standard deviation, 1SD, n=5) for delta Hg-202/198 relative to the initial isotopic composition in the solution following 85-90% reduction of the Hg by SnCl2, NaBH4, UV photolysis, and ethylation with NaBEt4, respectively. Mass-dependent fractionation was found to be dominant for all reduction processes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available