4.5 Article

Role of MyD88 and TLR9 in the innate immune response elicited by serotype 5 adenoviral vectors

Journal

HUMAN GENE THERAPY
Volume 18, Issue 8, Pages 753-762

Publisher

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/hum.2007.016

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A replication-incompetent adenoviral ( Ad) vector is generating interest for both gene therapy and immunotherapy. A major limitation of the use of Ad vectors is the innate immune response, which causes inflammatory cytokine production and tissue damage; however, the precise mechanism of the innate immune response remains to be clarified. Here, we show that serotype 5 human Ad vectors elicit innate immune responses through a myeloid differentiating factor 88 ( MyD88)/ Toll-like receptor ( TLR)-9-dependent and/ or -independent manner according to cell type. After stimulation with Ad vectors, the production of interleukin ( IL)-6 and IL-12 was significantly decreased in MyD88-or TLR9-deficient dendritic cells ( DCs), compared with wild-type DCs. In addition, the surface expression of maturation marker proteins, such as CD40, CD80, CD86, and MHC class II, in MyD88-or TLR9-deficient granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor ( GM-CSF)-DCs was similar to that in wild-type DCs. On the other hand, MyD88-or TLR9-deficient peritoneal macrophages produced the same level of IL-6 as wild-type macrophages after infection with Ad vectors. We did not find any differences in the mRNA expression levels of the molecules involved in innate immunity, such as MyD88, TLR3, TLR7, and TLR9, between DCs and macrophages. The intravenous injection of luciferase-expressing Ad vectors into MyD88-or TLR9-deficient mice resulted in almost comparable levels of IL-6 and IL-12 production and luciferase expression with wild-type mice. These results suggest that Ad vectors can activate innate immunity via MyD88/ TLR9-dependent and -independent mechanisms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available