4.8 Article

Muscleblind-like 1 interacts with RNA hairpins in splicing target and pathogenic RNAs

Journal

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
Volume 35, Issue 16, Pages 5474-5486

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkm601

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIAMS NIH HHS [R01 AR046799, AR46799] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIEHS NIH HHS [ES013773, R01 ES013773] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIGMS NIH HHS [R01 GM031819, GM31819] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NINDS NIH HHS [U54 NS048843, NS48843] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The MBNL and CELF proteins act antagonistically to control the alternative splicing of specific exons during mammalian postnatal development. This process is dysregulated in myotonic dystrophy because MBNL proteins are sequestered by (CUG)(n) and (CCUG)(n) RNAs expressed from mutant DMPK and ZNF9 genes, respectively. While these observations predict that MBNL proteins have a higher affinity for these pathogenic RNAs versus their normal splicing targets, we demonstrate that MBNL1 possesses comparably high affinities for (CUG)(n) and (CAG)(n) RNAs as well as a splicing target, Tnnt3. Mapping of a MBNL1-binding site upstream of the Tnnt3 fetal exon indicates that a preferred binding site for this protein is a GC-rich RNA hairpin containing a pyrimidine mismatch. To investigate how pathogenic RNAs sequester MBNL1 in DM1 cells, we used a combination of chemical/ enzymatic structure probing and electron microscopy to determine that MBNL1 forms a ring-like structure which binds to the dsCUG helix. While the MBNL1N-terminal region is required for RNA binding, the C-terminal region mediates homotypic interactions which may stabilize intra- and/ or inter-ring interactions. Our results provide a mechanistic basis for dsCUG-induced MBNL1 sequestration and highlight a striking similarity in the binding sites for MBNL proteins on splicing precursor and pathogenic RNAs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available