4.7 Article

Metabolic profiling of major vitamin D metabolites using Diels-Alder derivatization and ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry

Journal

ANALYTICAL AND BIOANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 391, Issue 5, Pages 1917-1930

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00216-008-2095-8

Keywords

1 alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D-3; 25-hydroxyvitamin D-3; 24R,25-dihydroxyvitamin D-3; UPLC; LC-MS; metabolic profiling; derivatization

Funding

  1. NIEHS NIH HHS [R37 ES02710, P01 ES011269, P01 ES11269, P42 ES004699, R37 ES002710, P30 ES005707, T32 ES007059, P30 ES05707] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIMHD NIH HHS [P60 MD000222, P60 MD00222-01] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Biologically active forms of vitamin D are important analytical targets in both research and clinical practice. The current technology is such that each of the vitamin D metabolites is usually analyzed by individual assay. However, current LC-MS technologies allow the simultaneous metabolic profiling of entire biochemical pathways. The impediment to the metabolic profiling of vitamin D metabolites is the low level of 1 alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D-3 in human serum (15-60 pg/mL). Here, we demonstrate that liquid-liquid or solid-phase extraction of vitamin D metabolites in combination with Diels-Alder derivatization with the commercially available reagent 4-phenyl-1,2,4-triazoline-3,5-dione (PTAD) followed by ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC)-electrospray/tandem mass spectrometry analysis provides rapid and simultaneous quantification of 1 alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D-3, 1 alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D-2, 24R,25-dihydroxyvitamin D-3, 25-hydroxyvitamin D-3 and 25-hydroxyvitamin D-2 in 0.5 mL human serum at a lower limit of quantification of 25 pg/mL. Precision ranged from 1.6-4.8 % and 5-16 % for 25-hydroxyvitamin D-3 and 1 alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D-3, respectively, using solid-phase extraction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available