4.8 Article

Ligand activation of LXRβ reverses atherosclerosis and cellular cholesterol overload in mice lacking LXRα and apoE

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
Volume 117, Issue 8, Pages 2337-2346

Publisher

AMER SOC CLINICAL INVESTIGATION INC
DOI: 10.1172/JCI31909

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Howard Hughes Medical Institute Funding Source: Medline
  2. NCI NIH HHS [T32 CA009056, CA09056] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NHLBI NIH HHS [T32 HL069766, P01 HL030568, HL69766, HL66088, HL30568, R01 HL066088] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Liver X receptors (LXRs) alpha and beta are transcriptional regulators of cholesterol homeostasis and potential targets for the development of antiatherosclerosis drugs. However, the specific roles of individual LXR isotypes in atherosclerosis and the pharmacological effects of synthetic agonists remain unclear. Previous work has shown that mice lacking LXR alpha accumulate cholesterol in the liver but not in peripheral tissues. In striking contrast, we demonstrate here that LXR alpha(-)/(-)apoE(-)/(-) mice exhibit extreme cholesterol accumulation in peripheral tissues, a dramatic increase in whole-body cholesterol burden, and accelerated atherosclerosis. The phenotype of these mice suggests that the level of LXR pathway activation in macrophages achieved by LXR and endogenous ligand is unable to maintain homeostasis in the setting of hypercholesterolemia. Surprisingly, however, a highly efficacious synthetic agonist was able to compensate for the loss of LXR alpha. Treatment of LXR alpha(-)/(-)apoE(-)/(-) mice with synthetic LXR ligand ameliorates the cholesterol overload phenotype and reduces atherosclerosis. These observations indicate that LXR alpha has an essential role in maintaining peripheral cholesterol homeostasis in the context of hypercholesterolemia and provide in vivo support for drug development strategies targeting LXR beta.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available