4.7 Review

Lanthanide upconversion nanoparticles and applications in bioassays and bioimaging: A review

Journal

ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA
Volume 832, Issue -, Pages 1-33

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2014.04.030

Keywords

Upconversion; Lanthanide nanoparticles; Luminescence; Bioassays; Bioimaging

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineer Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  2. NSERC
  3. Ontario Ministry of Training, College and Universities (MTCU)
  4. Ontario Graduate Scholarship (OGS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Through the process of photon upconversion, trivalent lanthanide doped nanocrystals convert long-wavelength excitation radiation in the infrared or near infrared region to higher energy emission radiation from ultraviolet to infrared. Such materials offer potential for numerous advantages in analytical applications in comparison to molecular fluorophores and quantum dots. The use of IR radiation as an excitation source reduces autofluorescence and scattering of excitation radiation, which leads to a reduction of background in optical experiments. The upconverting nanocrystals offer excellent photostability and are composed of materials that are not particularly toxic to biological organisms. Excitation at long wavelengths also minimizes damage to biological materials. In this review, the different mechanisms responsible for the upconversion process, and methods that are used to synthesize and decorate upconverting nanoparticles are presented to indicate how absorption and emission can be tuned. Examples of recent applications of upconverting nanoparticles in bioassays for the detection of proteins, nucleic acids, metabolites and metal ions offer indications of analytical advantages in the development of methods of analysis. Examples include multi-color and multi-modal imaging, and the use of upconverting nanoparticles in theranostics. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available