4.7 Article

NP stoichiometry of low-alpine heathland: Usefulness for bio-monitoring and prediction of pollution impacts

Journal

BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION
Volume 138, Issue 1-2, Pages 100-108

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2007.04.006

Keywords

Calluna vulgaris; nitrogen deposition; nutrient limitation; N : P ratio; Racomitrium lanuginosum; soil phosphorus

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Plant communities in the low-alpine zone are exposed to relatively high levels of nitrogen (N) deposition compared to surrounding lowland areas and this has the potential to alter community composition and ecosystem function. N content and nitrogen: phosphor-us (P) ratio of plant tissues have been used as bio-monitors of N deposition impacts in subalpine systems but their suitability in alpine habitats is unknown. We investigated spatial variation in N content and N:P in Calluna vulgaris and Racomitrium lanuginosum in low-alpine heathlands across Scotland and related this to. nitrogen deposition, climate and soil chemistry. N content in C. uulgaris and R. lanugiriosum were not well predicted by N deposition estimates and it appears that altitude and climate also have strong influences on plant chemistry which must be accounted for before using these parameters as bio-indicators of deposition. N:P ratios in C. uulgaris suggested that most sites are currently co-limited by N and P or P limited. The degree of P limitation was strongly related to P content of the soil and hence to underlying rock type. We suggest that this high degree of co-limitation may be the result of accumulated long term N deposition in mountain regions. Vegetation on soils with low P content and strong P limitation on growth is least likely to sequester N inputs in additional biomass production and so may be the most vulnerable to N saturation and breakthrough of N into surface waters. C 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available