4.6 Article

Nucleotide excision repair eliminates unique DNA-protein cross-links from mammalian cells

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 282, Issue 31, Pages -

Publisher

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M702856200

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM59219] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

DNA- protein cross-links (DPCs) present a formidable obstacle to cellular processes because they are superbulky compared with the majority of chemical adducts. Elimination of DPCs is critical for cell survival because their persistence can lead to cell death or halt cell cycle progression by impeding DNA and RNA synthesis. To study DPC repair, we have used DNA methyltransferases to generate unique DPC adducts in oligodeoxyribonucleotides or plasmids to monitor both in vitro excision and in vivo repair. We show that HhaI DNA methyltransferase covalently bound to an oligodeoxyribonucleotide is not efficiently excised by using mammalian cell-free extracts, but protease digestion of the full-length HhaI DNA methyltransferase-DPC yields a substrate that is efficiently removed by a process similar to nucleotide excision repair (NER). To examine the repair of that unique DPC, we have developed two plasmid-based in vivo assays for DPC repair. One assay shows that in nontranscribed regions, DPC repair is greater than 60% in 6 h. The other assay based on host cell reactivation using a green fluorescent protein demonstrates that DPCs in transcribed genes are also repaired. Using Xpg-deficient cells (NER-defective) with the in vivo host cell reactivation assay and a unique DPC indicates that NER has a role in the repair of this adduct. We also demonstrate a role for the 26 S proteasome in DPC repair. These data are consistent with a model for repair in which the polypeptide chain of a DPC is first reduced by proteolysis prior to NER.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available