4.7 Article

A new method for precise determination of iron, zinc and cadmium stable isotope ratios in seawater by double-spike mass spectrometry

Journal

ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA
Volume 793, Issue -, Pages 44-52

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2013.07.025

Keywords

Iron; Zinc; Cadmium; Isotopic; Marine; Nobias

Funding

  1. University of South Carolina
  2. NSF [OCE-1131387]
  3. Division Of Ocean Sciences
  4. Directorate For Geosciences [1131387] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study of Fe, Zn and Cd stable isotopes (delta Fe-56, delta Zn-66 and delta Cd-114) in seawater is a new field, which promises to elucidate the marine cycling of these bioactive trace metals. However, the analytical challenges posed by the low concentration of these metals in seawater has meant that previous studies have typically required large sample volumes, highly limiting data collection in the oceans. Here, we present the first simultaneous method for the determination of these three isotope systems in seawater, using Nobias PA-1 chelating resin to extract metals from seawater, purification by anion exchange chromatography, and analysis by double spike MC-ICPMS. This method is designed for use on only a single litre of seawater and has blanks of 0.3, 0.06 and <0.03 ng for Fe, Zn and Cd respectively, representing a 1-20 fold reduction in sample size and a 4-130 decrease in blank compared to previously reported methods. The procedure yields data with high precision for all three elements (typically 0.02-0.2 parts per thousand; 1 sigma internal precision), allowing us to distinguish natural variability in the oceans, which spans 1-3 parts per thousand for all three isotope systems. Simultaneous extraction and purification of three metals makes this method ideal for high-resolution, large-scale endeavours such as the GEOTRACES program. (c) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available