4.6 Article

Model systems for probing metal cation hydration:: The V+(H2O) and ArV+(H2O) complexes

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY A
Volume 111, Issue 31, Pages 7599-7610

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp071206q

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In support of mass-selected infrared photodissociation (IRPD) spectroscopy experiments, coupled-cluster methods including all single and double excitations (CCSD) and a perturbative contribution from connected triple excitations [CCSD(T)] have been used to study the V+(H2O) and ArV+(H2O) complexes. Equilibrium geometries, harmonic vibrational frequencies, and dissociation energies were computed for the four lowest-lying quintet states ((5)A(1), (5)A(2), B-5(1), and B-5(2)), all of which appear within a 6 kcal mol(-1) energy range. Moreover, anharmonic vibrational analyses with complete quartic force fields were executed for the (5)A(1) states of V+(H2O) and ArV+(H2O). Two different basis sets were used: a Wachters+f V[8s6p4d1f] basis with triple-zeta plus polarization (TZP) for O, H, and Ar; and an Ahlrichs QZVPP V[11s6p5d3f2g] and Ar[9s6p4d2f1g] basis with aug-cc-pVQZ for O and H. The ground state is predicted to be (5)A(1) for V+(H2O), but argon tagging changes the lowest-lying state to B-5(1) for ArV+(H2O). Our computations show an opening of 2 degrees-3 degrees in the equilibrium bond angle of H2O due to its interaction with the metal ion. Zero-point vibrational averaging increases the effective bond angle further by 2.0 degrees-2.5 degrees, mostly because of off-axis motion of the heavy vanadium atom rather than changes in the water bending potential. The total theoretical shift in the bond angle of about +4 degrees is significantly less than the widening near 9 degrees deduced from IRPD experiments. The binding energies (D-0) for the successive addition of H2O and Ar to the vanadium cation are 36.2 and 9.4 kcal mol(-1), respectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available