4.7 Article

Hubble ultra deep field-jd2:: Mid-infrared evidence for a z ∼ 2 luminous infrared galaxy

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 665, Issue 1, Pages 257-264

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/519243

Keywords

cosmology : observations; early universe; galaxies : evolution; galaxies : individual (HUDF-JD2)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Hubble Ultra Deep Field source JD2 presented in Mobasher et al. is an unusual galaxy that is very faint at all wavelengths shortward of 1.1 mu m. Photometric redshift fits to data between 0.4 and 8 mu m yield a significant probability that it is an extremely massive galaxy at z similar to 6: 5. In this paper we present new photometry at 16 and 22 mu m from Spitzer Infrared Spectrograph (IRS) peak-up imaging of the Great Observatories Origins Deep Survey ( GOODS) fields. We find that the spectral energy distribution shows a factor of similar to 4 rise in flux density between the 16 and 22 mu m bandpass, which is most likely due to the entrance of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon emission features into the 22 and 24 mu m passbands. The flux ratio between these bandpasses can be best fit by a z 1: 7 luminous infrared galaxy with a bolometric luminosity of ( 2 6); 1011 L-circle dot corresponding to a star formation rate of 80 M-circle dot yr(-1). The predicted flux density values at other longer wavelengths are below the detection limits of current instrumentation, but such sources could potentially be detected in lensed submillimeter surveys. Reevaluation of the optical/near-infrared photometry continues to favor z > 6 photometric redshift solutions, but we argue that the consistency of the multiwavelength parameters of this galaxy with other dusty starbursts favor the z similar to 2 mid-infrared photometric redshift. The data presented here provide evidence that optically undetected near-infrared sources that are detected at 24 mu m are most likely dusty, starburst galaxies at a redshift of z similar to 2 with stellar masses > 10(10) M-circle dot.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available