4.7 Article

Observational constraints on interstellar grain alignment

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 665, Issue 1, Pages 369-389

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/519755

Keywords

dust, extinction; ISM : individual (Southern Coalsack, Chamaeleon I, Musca, rho Ophiuchus, R CrA, Taurus); polarization

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present new multicolor photopolarimetry of stars behind the Southern Coalsack. Analyzed together with multiband polarization data from the literature, probing the Chamaeleon I, Musca, rho Opiuchus, R CrA, and Taurus clouds, we show that the wavelength of maximum polarization (lambda(max)) is linearly correlated with the radiation environment of the grains. Using far-infrared emission data, we show that the large scatter seen in previous studies of lambda(max) as a function of A(V) is primarily due to line-of-sight effects causing some A(V) measurements to not be a good tracer of the extinction (radiation field strength) seen by the grains being probed. The derived slopes in (lambda max) versus A(V), for the individual clouds, are consistent with a common value, while the zero intercepts scale with the average values of the ratios of total to selective extinction (R-V) for the individual clouds. Within each cloud we do not find direct correlations between lambda(max) and R-V. The positive slope is consistent with recent developments in theory and indicating alignment driven by the radiation field. The present data cannot conclusively differentiate between direct radiative torques and alignment driven by H-2 formation. However, the small values of lambda(max)(A(V) = 0), seen in several clouds, suggest a role for the latter, at least at the cloud surfaces. The scatter in the lambda(max) versus A(V) relation is found to be associated with the characteristics of the embedded YSOs in the clouds. We propose that this is partially due to locally increased plasma damping of the grain rotation caused by X-rays from the YSOs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available