4.7 Article

An ultrasensitive quantum dots fluorescent polarization immunoassay based on the antibody modified Au nanoparticles amplifying for the detection of adenosine triphosphate

Journal

ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA
Volume 802, Issue -, Pages 67-73

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2013.10.011

Keywords

Fluorescent polarization immunoassay; Quantum dots; Au nanoparticles; Adenosine triphosphate

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21165004, 21163002]
  2. Guangxi Natural Science Foundation of China [2010GXNSFF013001, 2012GXNSFBA053022, 2013GXNSFBA019044]
  3. Innovation Plan in Graduate Education of Guangxi Province [2010106020703M70]
  4. project of Key Laboratory for the Chemistry and Molecular Engineering of Medicinal Resources (Guangxi Normal University), Ministry of Education of China [CMEMR2011-14]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this work, an ultrasensitive fluorescent polarization immunoassay (FPIA) method based on the quantum dot/aptamer/antibody/gold nanoparticles ensemble has been developed for the detection of adenosine triphosphate (ATP). DNA hybridization is formed when ATP is present in the PBS solution containing the DNA-conjugated quantum dots (QDs) and antibody-AuNPs. The substantial sensitivity improvement of the antibody-AuNPs-enhanced method is mainly attributed to the slower rotation of fluorescent unit when QDs-labeled oligonucleotides hybridize with antibody modified the gold nanopartide. As a result, the fluorescent polarization (FP) values of the system increase significantly. Under the optimal conditions, a linear response with ATP concentration is ranged from 8 x 10(-12) M to 2.40 x 10(-4) M. The detection limit reached as low as 1.8 pM. The developed work provides a sensitive and selective immunoassay protocol for ATP detection, which could be applied in more bioanalytical systems. Crown Copyright (C) 2013 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available