4.7 Article

CSF tau/Aβ42 ratio for increased risk of mild cognitive impairment -: A follow-up study

Journal

NEUROLOGY
Volume 69, Issue 7, Pages 631-639

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000267428.62582.aa

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIA NIH HHS [AG08017, AG05136] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Processes of Alzheimer disease (AD) likely begin years prior to the onset of cognitive impairment (latent AD), progress though a prodromal phase of mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and culminate in dementia. While many studies have evaluated CSF tau and A beta(42) as biomarkers of the dementia or prodromal stages of AD, we are unaware of any study to evaluate these potential CSF biomarkers of latent AD. Methods: We determined the ratio of CSF tau/A beta(42) (T/A beta) using Luminex reagents in 129 control individuals that spanned from 21 to 100 years of age; for comparison we included patients with MCI (n = 12), probable AD (n = 21), or other neurodegenerative diseases (n = 12). Results: We identified 16% of the control group with abnormally elevated CSF T/A beta; all were 53 years or older. Using age-matched controls with normal CSF T/A beta we showed that the high CSF T/A beta subgroup of controls had significantly increased frequency of the epsilon 4 allele of the apolipoprotein E gene and significantly increased risk of conversion to MCI during follow-up of up to 42 months suggesting that they had latent AD at the time of lumbar puncture. Conclusions: These generally applicable methods establish cutoff values to identify control individuals at increased risk of conversion to mild cognitive impairment which may be useful to people weighing the risk-benefit ratio of new preventive therapeutics and to researchers striving to enrich clinical trial populations with people with latent Alzheimer disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available