4.7 Article

Effects of multiple oral doses of an A1 adenosine antagonist, BG9928, in patients with heart failure -: Results of a placebo-controlled, dose-escalation study

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume 50, Issue 7, Pages 600-606

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.03.059

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives This study sought to assess the pharmacokinetics and clinical effects of oral BG9928 in heart failure (HF) patients. Background Declining renal function during HF treatment is associated with poor outcomes. BG9928, a selective inhibitor of the Al adenosine receptor, is proposed to cause natriuresis without causing a decline in renal function. Methods A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted in patients with HF and systolic dysfunction who were receiving standard therapy. Patients were randomized to receive BG9928 (3, 15, 75, or 225 mg) or placebo orally for 10 days. The primary end point was change in sodium excretion. Changes in potassium excretion, creatinine clearance, and body weight also were evaluated. Results A total of 50 patients were studied. BG9928 increased sodium excretion compared with placebo, and natriuresis was maintained over 10 days with little kaliuresis. A linear trend in dose response was observed on day 1 (p = 0.04) but not on days 6 or 10. Adjusted creatinine clearance was unchanged over the 10 days. Patients who received 15, 75, or 225 mg of BG9928 had a reduction in body weight compared with placebo (-0.6, -0.7, -0.5, vs. +0.3 kg, respectively) at the end of study. BG9928 was well tolerated. The pharmacokinetic profile of BG9928 was consistent with once-daily dosing. Conclusions Oral BG9928 over the dose range of 3 to 225 mg/day produced significant increases in sodium excretion in patients with stable HF without causing kaliuresis or reducing renal function. (J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50:600-6) (c) 2007 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available