4.7 Article

Sustained low-grade pro-inflammatory state in unmedicated, remitted women with major depressive disorder as evidenced by elevated serum levels of the acute phase proteins c-reactive protein and serum amyloid a

Journal

BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY
Volume 62, Issue 4, Pages 309-313

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.09.033

Keywords

acute phase response; biomarkers; cardiovascular disease; depression; innate immunity; risk factors

Funding

  1. Intramural NIH HHS [Z01 MH002659-13, Z01 CL010306-07, Z01 MH002817-03] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Major depressive disorder (MDD) shows increased coronary artery disease (CAD) risk of unknown mechanism(s). MDD is more common in women than men; CAD diagnosis can be difficult in women. Elevations of the inflammatory markers C-reactive protein (CRP) and serum amyloid A (SAA) predict increased CAD risk in populations; few data on these markers exist in MDD, particularly in remitted patients. Methods: We measured fasting am serum CRP (high sensitivity, CRPhs) and SAA in 18 unmedicated, remitted women with MDD (mean age 41 +/- (SD) 12, body mass index (BMI) 25.2 +/- 4.1 kg/m(2)) and 18 BMI-matched healthy control subjects (age 36 10, BMI 25.3 +/- 3.8 kg/m(2)) on 2 separate occasions, ! 6 days apart. Results: Repeat SAA and CRPhs measurements strongly correlated across study days (SAA: r = .83, p < .001; CRPhs: r = .94, p < .001). Both SAA (5.30 +/- 3.39 vs. 2.84 +/- 1.87 mg/L, p < .005) and CRPhs (3.23 +/- 3.17 vs. 1.12 +/- 1.45 mg/L; p < .01) were significantly elevated in MDD women versus controls. Conclusions: Elevated SAA and CRPhs in remitted, unmedicated women with MDD indicate a pro-inflammatory state unrelated to current depressive symptoms or pharmacotherapy. These findings suggest that inflammatory mechanisms may in part underlie findings of increased CAD risk in MDD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available