4.7 Article

Survival times of subducted slab remnants in numerical models of mantle flow

Journal

EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE LETTERS
Volume 260, Issue 1-2, Pages 23-36

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2007.05.009

Keywords

slab remnants; viscosity stratification; mantle flow models; 3D mantle flow; 3D numerical models

Funding

  1. Natural Environment Research Council [NER/O/S/2001/01227] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We examine the rate of sinking of truncated subducted slabs in a series of idealized three-dimensional and two-dimensional simulations using a 3D Cartesian numerical convection model. Our goal is to account for the inference from seismic tomographic studies that some slab remnants have persisted at mid-mantle depths for 150 Myr or more while others have descended to the base of the mantle, where the, have spread laterally for great distances along the core-mantle boundary. We consider the influence of initial slab dimensions, mantle viscosity stratification, slab dip angle and three-dimensionality on the 'slab survival time' - the time required to clear the upper half of the mantle of all measurable traces of a previous subduction zone. We find slab survival time is determined by two principal factors: the initial slab length and the viscosity stratification of the mantle. Survival time decreases with increasing slab length and increases with increasing viscosity stratification. For a viscosity jump by a factor of 100 at a depth of 660 km, shallow slab remnants remain in the upper 1500 kin of the mantle for times well in excess of 150 Myr while deep slabs draw their upper portions out of the upper half of the mantle in about 150 Myr. The dependence of the age of slab remnants on both the total depth extent of the oilginal slab and the degree of viscosity stratification has not been studied previously; it can account for the different rates of descent of slabs lying in close geographic proximity. (c) 2007 Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available