4.7 Article

Activated mammalian target of rapamycin is an adverse prognostic factor in patients with biliary tract adenocarcinoma

Journal

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
Volume 13, Issue 16, Pages 4795-4799

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-0738

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) is a protein kinase that plays a key role in cellular growth and homeostasis. Because its regulation is frequently altered in tumors, mTOR is currently under investigation as a potential target for anticancer therapy. The purpose of our study was to determine the prognostic value of activated mTOR (p-mTOR) in patients with biliary tract adenocarcinoma (BTA), in order to strengthen the rationale for targeted therapy of BTA using mTOR inhibitors. Experimental Design: We determined expression of p-mTOR in paraffin-embedded surgical specimens of BTA by immunohistochemistry with a monoclonal antibody to phosphorylated mTOR. Overall survival was analyzed with a Cox model adjusted for clinical and pathologic factors. Results: Immunostaining for p-mTOR was positive in 56 to 88 (64%) tumors. Activated mTOR was not associated with any of the clinical or pathologic variables of the patients but predicted overall survival of the patients. Overall survival was significantly shorter in patients with p-mTOR-positive tumors as compared with patients with p-mTOR-negative tumors (hazard ratio for death 2.57; 95% confidence interval, 1.35-4.89; P=0.004). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analyses identified p-mTOR to be an independent prognostic factor for death (adjusted hazard ratio for death, 2.44; 95% confidence interval, 1.24-4.80; P=0.01). Conclusions: Patients with BTA and p-mTOR-positive tumors have a significantly shorter overall survival than patients with p-mTOR-negative tumors and may benefit from targeted therapy with mTOR inhibitors in the future.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available