4.7 Review

Toward decentralized analysis of mercury (II) in real samples. A critical review on nanotechnology-based methodologies

Journal

ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA
Volume 800, Issue -, Pages 1-11

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2013.07.067

Keywords

Amalgam; Mercury (II) ion; Nanoparticle; Electrode; Real sample

Funding

  1. Comision Sectorial de Investigacion Cientifica (CSIC, UdelaR)
  2. Fondo Clemente Estable (FCE, ANII)
  3. PEDECIBA

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In recent years, it has increased the number of works focused on the development of novel nanoparticle-based sensors for mercury detection, mainly motivated by the need of low cost portable devices capable of giving fast and reliable analytical response, thus contributing to the analytical decentralization. Methodologies employing colorimetric, fluorometric, magnetic, and electrochemical output signals allowed reaching detection limits within the pM and nM ranges. Most of these developments proved their suitability in detecting and quantifying mercury (II) ions in synthetic solutions or spiked water samples. However, the state of art in these technologies is still behind the standard methods of mercury quantification, such as cold vapor atomic absorption spectrometry and inductively coupled plasma techniques, in terms of reliability and sensitivity. This is mainly because the response of nanoparticle-based sensors is highly affected by the sample matrix. The developed analytical nanosystems may fail in real samples because of the negative incidence of the ionic strength and the presence of exchangeable ligands. The aim of this review is to critically consider the recently published innovations in this area, and highlight the needs to include more realistic assays in future research in order to make these advances suitable for on-site analysis. (C) 2013 Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available