4.7 Article

Comparison of storage stability of odorous VOCs in polyester aluminum and polyvinyl fluoride Tedlar® bags

Journal

ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA
Volume 712, Issue -, Pages 162-167

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2011.11.014

Keywords

Tedlar bag (PVF); Polyester bag (PEA); Relative recovery; Storage time; Sorptive loss

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
  2. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (MEST) [2009-0093848]
  3. Human Resources Development of the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP)
  4. Korea government Ministry of Knowledge Economy [20100092]
  5. Korea Institute of Marine Science & Technology Promotion (KIMST) [20100092] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Whole air sampling using containers such as flexible bags or rigid canisters is commonly used to collect samples of volatile organic compounds (VOC) in air. The objective of this study was to compare the stability of polyester aluminum (PEA) and polyvinyl fluoride (PVF, brand name Tedlar (R)) bags for gaseous VOC sampling. Eight VOC standards (benzene, toluene, p-xylene, styrene, methyl ethyl ketone, methyl isobutyl ketone, butyl acetate, and isobutyl alcohol) were placed into each bag at storage times of 0, 2, and 3 days prior to analyses by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS). From each bag representing each storage day, samples of 3 different mass loadings were withdrawn and analyzed to derive response factors (RF) of each chemical between the slope of the GC response (y-axis) vs. loaded mass (x-axis). The relative recoveries (RR) of VOC, if derived by dividing RF value of a given storage day by that of 0 day, varied by time, bag type, and VOC type. If the RR values after three days are compared, those of methyl isobutyl ketone were the highest with 96 (PVF) and 99% (PEA): however, the results of isobutyl alcohol were highly contrasting between the two bags with 31 and 94%, respectively. Differences in RR values between the two bag types increased with storage time, such that RR of PEA bags (88 +/- 10%) were superior to those of PVF bags (73 +/- 22%) after three days, demonstrating that VOC in PEA bags were more stable than in PVF bags. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available