4.7 Article

Electrochemical detection of hydrazine using a highly sensitive nanoporous gold electrode

Journal

ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA
Volume 711, Issue -, Pages 32-39

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2011.11.002

Keywords

Nanoporous; Electrodeposition; Alloy-dealloy; Hydrazine; Electrochemical detection

Funding

  1. National Science Council of Taiwan [NSC98-2113-M-037-007-MY3]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A facile alloy-dealloy technique performed in aqueous media was employed to prepare a nanoporous gold (NPG) electrode that demonstrated extremely high sensitivity toward hydrazine oxidation. An Ag similar to 60Au similar to 40 alloy was electrodeposited at a constant potential on sequentially Cr- and Au-deposited indium tin oxide (Au/Cr/ITO) from a bath that contained sulfuric acid, thiourea. HAuCl4 center dot 3H(2)O, and AgNO3. The dealloying step was performed in concentrated HNO3, where Ag in the alloy was selectively oxidized to leave the NPG structure. The NPG electrode was employed to study the hydrazine oxidation in basic phosphate buffer solution (PBS), and the results were compared with those obtained using the gold nanoparticle (AuNP)-modified ITO (AuNP/ITO) electrode. The NPG electrode demonstrated an unusual surface-confined behavior, which probably resulted from the thin-layer characteristics of the nano-pores. Hydrazine was detected by hydrodynamic chronoamperometry (HCA) at +0.2 V (vs. Ag/AgCl). The steady-state oxidative current exhibited a linear dependence on the hydrazine concentration in the concentration range 01 5.00 nM-2.05 mM, and the detection limit was 4.37 nM (sigma = 3). This detection limit is the lower than the detection limits reported in the current literature concerning the electrochemical detection of hydrazine. The NPG electrode indeed demonstrates greater stability after hydrazine detection than the AuNP/ITO electrode. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available