4.7 Article

Self-doped polyaniline as new polyaniline substitute for solid-phase microextraction

Journal

ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA
Volume 683, Issue 2, Pages 206-211

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2010.10.031

Keywords

Self-doped polyaniline; Solid-phase microextraction; 1,4-Dioxane; Nano-structure

Funding

  1. Research Council and graduates school of Khajeh Nasir Toosi University (K.N.T.U.)
  2. Iranian National Institute for Oceanography

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This work is a first study on extraction efficiency and thermal stability of nano-structured self-doped polyaniline (SPAN) as a coating of solid-phase microextraction (SPME) fibers. SPAN-based fibers were prepared using electrochemical deposition on platinum wires. The particle sizes of prepared nano-structure were in the range of 50-100 nm. Extraction properties of the fiber to 1,4-dioxane were examined using headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME) coupled to gas chromatography-flame ionization detection (GC-FID). The results have proved higher thermal stability of the proposed fiber compared to common PANI fiber. The SPAN coating was proved to be very stable at relatively high temperatures (up to 350 degrees C) with high extraction capacity and long lifespan (more than 50 times). Therefore, it can be a good substitute of polyaniline (PANI) as a SPME coating. The extraction procedure was optimized by selecting the appropriate extraction parameters including extraction time, extraction temperature. salt concentration, stirring rate and headspace volume. Calibration graph was linear in the concentration range of 1-100 ngmL(-1) (R-2>0.993) with detection limit of 0.1 ng mL(-1). Single fiber and fiber-to-fiber repeatability were lower than 6.0% and 10.4%, respectively. Different water samples were analyzed as real samples and good recoveries (98-120%) were obtained. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available