4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Phase II trial of sorafenib in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck or nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 25, Issue 24, Pages 3766-3773

Publisher

AMER SOC CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2006.10.2871

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose To determine the efficacy and safety of single- agent sorafenib in patients with recurrent and/ or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck ( SCCHN) and nasopharyngeal carcinoma ( NPC). Patients and Methods In this single- arm phase II trial, oral continuous sorafenib was administered in 28- day cycles. Patients had <= one line of chemotherapy for recurrent and/ or metastatic disease, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of <= 2, and adequate organ function. At the end of stage 1, efficacy criteria for further accrual were not met, but the study was amended to enroll an additional five patients for paired tumor biopsies. Results Twenty- seven and 26 patients were eligible for toxicity and efficacy evaluations, respectively. One patient ( 3.7%; 95% CI, 0.1% to 19.0%) achieved a partial response. Disease stabilization was maintained in 10 patients ( 37.0%; 95% CI, 22.4% to 61.2%). The median time to progression was 1.8 months ( 95% CI, 1.6 to 3.4 months), and median overall survival time was 4.2 months ( 95% CI, 3.6 to 8.7 months). Sorafenib was well tolerated with few grade 3 and no grade 4 toxicities. Biomarker analysis of paired tumor samples before and after treatment with sorafenib revealed a decrease of pERK in all five patients, with a decrease in Ki67 in four patients, consistent with a disruption of ERK signaling. The antiapoptotic protein Mcl- 1 was downregulated in four patients, and there was also evidence of antiangiogenic activity. Conclusion Sorafenib was well tolerated and had modest anticancer activity comparable to monotherapy with other targeted agents in this group of patients. Further development in combination with radiation or other agents may be warranted.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available