4.7 Article

A disposable electrochemical immunosensor for prolactin involving affinity reaction on streptavidin-functionalized magnetic particles

Journal

ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA
Volume 692, Issue 1-2, Pages 125-130

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2011.02.062

Keywords

Prolactin; Immunosensor; Electrochemical; Magnetic particles; Screen-printed electrodes

Funding

  1. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion [DPS2008-07005-C02-01, CTQ2009-12650]
  2. Comunidad de Madrid [S2009/PPQ-1642]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A novel electrochemical immunosensor was developed for the determination of the hormone prolactin. The design involved the use of screen-printed carbon electrodes and streptavidin-functionalized magnetic particles. Biotinylated anti-prolactin antibodies were immobilized onto the functionalized magnetic particles and a sandwich-type immunoassay involving prolactin and anti-prolactin antibody labelled with alkaline phosphatase was employed. The resulting bio-conjugate was trapped on the surface of the screen-printed electrode with a small magnet and prolactin quantification was accomplished by differential pulse voltammetry of 1-naphtol formed in the enzyme reaction using 1-naphtyl phosphate as alkaline phosphatase substrate. All variables involved in the preparation of the immunosensor and in the electrochemical detection step were optimized. The calibration plot for prolactin exhibited a linear range between 10 and 2000 ng mL(-1) with a slope value of 7.0 nA mLng(-1). The limit of detection was 3.74 ng mL(-1). Furthermore, the modified magnetic beads-antiprolactin conjugates showed an excellent stability. The immunosensor exhibited also a high selectivity with respect to other hormones. The analytical usefulness of the immnunosensor was demonstrated by analyzing human sera spiked with prolactin at three different concentration levels. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available