4.7 Article

Orthogonal array design for the optimization of hollow fiber protected liquid-phase microextraction of salicylates from environmental waters

Journal

ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA
Volume 689, Issue 2, Pages 219-225

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2011.01.045

Keywords

Orthogonal array design; Hollow fiber protected liquid-phase microextraction; High-performance liquid chromatography; Salicylates; Environmental analysis

Funding

  1. Nature Science Fund of Hubei Province [2010CDB03205]
  2. National Nature Science Foundation of China [21075091]
  3. Huazhong University of Science and Technology [0124514009]
  4. Tongji Medical School [01-25-514021]
  5. Important National Science & Technology Specific Projects [2009ZX09301-014]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the present study, a three phase-based hollow fiber protected liquid-phase microextraction (HF-LPME) method combined with high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) for the determination of salicylates in environmental waters was developed. The HF-LPME procedure was optimized by an L-16(4(5)) orthogonal array experimental design (OAD) with five factors at four levels. Under the optimal extraction condition (pHs of donor and receiving phases of 3.0 and 6.2, respectively, extraction time of 45 min, stirring speed of 1000 rpm, and salt addition of 20% (w/v)), salicylates could be determined in a linear range from 0.025 to 1.0 mu g mL(-1) with a good correlation (r(2) > 0.9930). The limits of detection (LODs) ranged between 0.6 ng mL(-1) and 1.2 ng mL(-1) for the target analytes. The relative standard deviations (RSDs) of intra-day and inter-day were in the range of 0.64-14.58% and 0.16-15.45%, respectively. This procedure afforded a convenient, sensitive, accurate and cost-saving operation with high extraction efficiency for the model analytes. The method was applied satisfactorily to the determination of salicylates in two environmental waters. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available