4.6 Article

Scent marking behavior in male C57BL/6J mice: Sexual and developmental determination

Journal

BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH
Volume 182, Issue 1, Pages 73-79

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2007.05.007

Keywords

C57BL/6J; urine marking; sexual behavior; aggressive behavior; odor recognition; urinary odor

Funding

  1. NIMH NIH HHS [R01 MH081845] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [U54 NS039406-070007, U54 NS039406] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The present study investigated urinary scent marking behavior in male C57BL/6J (C57) mice as olfactory social signaling. In Experiment 1, when compared scent marking toward adult males, C57 males showed substantial scent marking toward CD-1 males and even toward the odor alone of CD-1 males, but not toward C57 males. Experiment 2 explored scent marking in C57 males of different ages to males and females, and juveniles and adults of the same strain. C57 males deposited more marks than control conditions only toward an adult C57 female when tested at 100 days of age. but not at 60 days of age. Development of urine marking behavior was investigated in C57 males at the ages of 30, 60, 90, and 120 days in Experiment 3. When tested alone (control) or confronted with a C57 male, C57 males showed diminished scent marks throughout development. Compared to controls, marking toward a CD-I male increased after the age of 60 days, while marks toward an adult female showed significant increases after the age of 90 days. This difference in scent marking depending on the sex of the stimulus animal is likely to be associated with development of sexual behavior, in which males need to set up territories against other males prior to advertising to females. Although highly inbred strains have similar odor components, C57 males are able to detect and deposit urine marks after puberty as social communication depending on age, sex, and genetic differences in the opponents. (c) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available