4.7 Article

Detection and identification of hydrophilic selenium compounds in selenium-rich yeast by size exclusion-microbore normal-phase HPLC with the on-line ICP-MS and electrospray Q-TOF-MS detection

Journal

ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA
Volume 657, Issue 2, Pages 175-190

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2009.10.040

Keywords

Normal phase; HILIC; Selenium enriched yeast metabolome; ICP-MS; ESI MS/MS

Funding

  1. French Ministry of Research and Education
  2. Region of Aquitaine
  3. FEDER [CPER 20.6]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Normal-phase HPLC and hydrophilic interaction HPLC (HILIC) were investigated for the separation of selenometabolites in a water extract of Se-rich yeast prior to their detection by ICP-MS and identification by electrospray MS/MS. The targeted fraction was a low-abundant fraction co-eluting with salt and sulfur analogues in size-exclusion chromatography which has so far been inaccessible to Se speciation studies. The optimization of the separation conditions resulted in the highest separation efficiency when HILIC was used and elution was carried out isocratically with a low concentration ammonium acetate buffer (1 mM ammonium acetate/10mM acetic acid) in 80% acetonitrile. Out of 15 peaks observed with the Se-specific ICP-MS detection 12 was identified by electrospray Q-TOF MS/MS (2,3-dihydroxypropionyl (DHP)-Se-methylselenocysteine [M+H](+): 272, Se-methyl-gamma-glutamyl-selenocysteinylglycine dioxide [M+H](+): 402, gamma-glutanlyl-Se-methylselenocysteine[M+H](+): 313; isomers of gamma-glutamylselenocystathionine [M+H](+): 400; Se-methyl-selenoglutathione [M+H](+): 370, isomers of N-acetylselenocystathionine [M+H](+): 313, 2,3-DHP-selenohomolanthionine [M+H](+): 373, isomers of 2,3-DHP-seienocystathionine[M+H](+): 359,2,3-DHP-selenolanthionine [M+H](+): 345 and selenohomolanthionine [M+H](+): 285). (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available