4.7 Article

Nonlinear evolution of the magnetohydrodynamic Rayleigh-Taylor instability

Journal

PHYSICS OF FLUIDS
Volume 19, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.2767666

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We study the nonlinear evolution of the magnetic Rayleigh-Taylor instability using three-dimensional magnetohydrodynamic simulations. We consider the idealized case of two inviscid, perfectly conducting fluids of constant density separated by a contact discontinuity perpendicular to the effective gravity g, with a uniform magnetic field B parallel to the interface. Modes parallel to the field with wavelengths smaller than lambda(c)=B center dot B/(rho(h)-rho(l))g are suppressed (where rho(h) and rho(l) are the densities of the heavy and light fluids, respectively), whereas modes perpendicular to B are unaffected. We study strong fields with lambda(c) varying between 0.01 and 0.36 of the horizontal extent of the computational domain. Even a weak field produces tension forces on small scales that are significant enough to reduce shear (as measured by the distribution of the amplitude of vorticity), which in turn reduces the mixing between fluids, and increases the rate at which bubbles and finger are displaced from the interface compared to the purely hydrodynamic case. For strong fields, the highly anisotropic nature of unstable modes produces ropes and filaments. However, at late time flow along field lines produces large scale bubbles. The kinetic and magnetic energies transverse to gravity remain in rough equipartition and increase as t(4) at early times. The growth deviates from this form once the magnetic energy in the vertical field becomes larger than the energy in the initial field. We comment on the implications of our results to Z-pinch experiments, and a variety of astrophysical systems. (c) 2007 American Institute of Physics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available