4.5 Article

Structural reorganisation and potential toxicity of oligomeric species formed during the assembly of amyloid fibrils

Journal

PLOS COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY
Volume 3, Issue 9, Pages 1727-1738

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030173

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. EPSRC [EP/D06693X/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  2. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/D06693X/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2004-04462, 2005-214-C00049] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  4. Wellcome Trust Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Increasing evidence indicates that oligomeric protein assemblies may represent the molecular species responsible for cytotoxicity in a range of neurological disorders including Alzheimer and Parkinson diseases. We use all-atom computer simulations to reveal that the process of oligomerization can be divided into two steps. The first is characterised by a hydrophobic coalescence resulting in the formation of molten oligomers in which hydrophobic residues are sequestered away from the solvent. In the second step, the oligomers undergo a process of reorganisation driven by interchain hydrogen bonding interactions that induce the formation of beta sheet rich assemblies in which hydrophobic groups can become exposed. Our results show that the process of aggregation into either ordered or amorphous species is largely determined by a competition between the hydrophobicity of the amino acid sequence and the tendency of polypeptide chains to form arrays of hydrogen bonds. We discuss how the increase in solvent-exposed hydrophobic surface resulting from such a competition offers an explanation for recent observations concerning the cytotoxicity of oligomeric species formed prior to mature amyloid fibrils.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available