4.6 Article

Thermal sensitization through ROS modulation: A strategy to improve the efficacy of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy

Journal

SURGERY
Volume 142, Issue 3, Pages 384-392

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2007.03.013

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether modulation of cellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) provides a synergistic effect with hyperthermia to induce tumor cell death in a colon cancer cell line. Materials and Methods. HT-29 colon cancer cells were exposed to heat (43 degrees C) in the presence of the ROS-generating drug, 2-2'-azobis-(2-amidinopropane) dihydrochloride (AAPH) for I h. Viable cell mass and apoptosis was measured by M77 and annexin V staining, respectively. Oxidative stress was evaluated by DCFH fluorescence. Protein levels were determined by Western blot analysis. Results. A synergistic effect on cell viability with AAPH was noted under hyperthermic conditions as compared with hyperthermia alone (P < .05). The number of nonviable cells after hyperthermia and AAPH exposure was also significantly increased compared with AAPH at 37 degrees C (42% vs 20%, P < .05). ROS levels were increased modestly with AAPH at 37 degrees C, whereas they increased significantly in a dose-dependent manner with AAPH at 43 degrees C. Transient increases of phosphorylated-p38 and ERK and decreases in phosphorylated-AKT were observed in the cells exposed to AAPH at 43 degrees C. Pretreatment of inhibitors of p38 yielded additional decreases in cell mass when used in combination with AAPH and hyperthermia (P < .05). Increased expression of HSP 27 observed at 43 degrees C was abrogated with AAPH exposure. Conclusions. Oxidative stress increased the cytotoxic effects of hyperthermia in colon cancer cells. Thermal sensitization through modulation of cellular ROS may represent a novel approach to increase the efficacy of hyperthermia as an anticancer modality.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available