4.6 Article

Gamma knife stereotactic radiosurgery for acromegaly

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY
Volume 157, Issue 3, Pages 255-263

Publisher

BIO SCIENTIFICA LTD
DOI: 10.1530/EJE-07-0189

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Gamma knife radiosurgery (GKR) is an adjuvant treatment for acromegaly if surgery fails to normalize GH hypersecretion. Objective: To examine the effect of GKR on tumor growth and hypersecretion, and to characterize the adverse effect of this treatment. Design: Cross-sectional follow-up study, First, retrospective data pre- and post-GKR were collected. Patients: then underwent a predefined survey including radiological, endocrinological, ophthalmological, and neurosurgical evaluation. Setting: Norwegian National Center for gamma knife treatment. Patients: Sixty-one patients treated with GKR for acromegaly. Out of 5 5, 5 3 living patients underwent a detailed survey. The mean follow-up was 5.5 years. No patient was lost to follow-up. Results: Tumor growth was stopped in all patients. At 3, 5, and 10 years after GKR, 45, 58, and 86%, of patients had normal IGF-I levels. Consecutive hormone value analysis showed that patients receiving GH-suppressive medication had a more rapid decline in hypersecretion than those who did not receive such medication. Evaluated by survey baseline values alone, non-elevated IGF-I and GH levels below 5 mIU/l were found in 38%, GH-suppressive medication was terminated in 16 out of 40 patients following GKR. Nine out of 53 surveyed patients (17%) had normal IGF-I and GH nadir below 2.6mIU/l at glucose tolerance tests, while not on hormone-suppressive medication. Two patients developed minor visual field defects. Eight patients started hormone substitution therapy during the follow-up period. Conclusion: GKR is an effective adjuvant treatment for residual acromegaly, carrying few side effects.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available