4.3 Article

Two paralogous genes encoding small subunits of ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase in maize, Bt2 and L2, replace the single alternatively spliced gene found in other cereal species

Journal

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR EVOLUTION
Volume 65, Issue 3, Pages 316-327

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00239-007-9013-0

Keywords

starch; maize; ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Two types of gene encoding small subunits (SSU) of ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase, a starch-biosynthetic enzyme, have been found in cereals and other grasses. One of these genes encodes two SSU proteins. These are targeted to different subcellular compartments and expressed in different organs of the plant: the endosperm cytosol and the leaf plastids. The SSU gene encoding two proteins evolved from an ancestral gene encoding a single protein by the acquisition of an alternative first exon. Prior to the work reported here, this type of SSU gene had been found in all grasses examined except maize. In maize, two separate genes, Bt2 and L2, were known to have the same roles as the alternatively spliced gene found in other grasses. The evolutionary origin of these maize genes and their relationship to the SSU genes in other grasses were unclear. Here we show that Bt2 and L2 are paralogous genes that arose as a result of the tetraploidization of the maize genome. Both genes derive from an ancestral alternatively spliced SSU gene orthologous to that found in other grasses. Following duplication, the Bt2 and L2 genes diverged in function. Each took a different one of the two functions of the ancestral gene. Now Bt2 encodes the endosperm cytosolic SSU but does not contribute significantly to leaf AGPase activity. Similarly, L2 has lost the use of one of its two alternative first exons. It can no longer contribute to the endosperm cytosolic SSU but is probably responsible for the bulk of the leaf AGPase SSU.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available