4.7 Article

Protective effects of organosulfur compounds towards N-nitrosamine-induced DNA damage in the single-cell gel electrophoresis (SCGE)/HepG2 assay

Journal

FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY
Volume 45, Issue 9, Pages 1662-1669

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2007.02.032

Keywords

organosulfur compounds; N-nitrosamines; comet assay

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this study was to investigate the protective effect of organosulfur compounds towards N-nitrosamine-induced DNA damage in the single-cell get electrophoresis (SCGE)/HepG2 assay. N-Nitrosopyrrolidine (NPYR) and N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) incubated with formamidopyrimidine-DNA glycosylase (Fpg), caused a significant increase in oxidative DNA damage in comparison to the solvent control, the lowest effective concentrations, being 5 and 27 mM, respectively. NPYR exerted greater genotoxic effects than NDMA. None of the organosulfur compounds (OSCs) concentrations tested in presence or absence of Fpg enzyme, caused DNA damage per se. OSCs (diallyl sulfide, DAS and dipropyl sulfide, DPS, 1-50 mu M; diallyl disulfide, DADS and dipropyl disulfide, DPDS, 1-5 mu M) reduced the genotoxic effects of the N-nitrosamines in a dose-dependent manner when HepG2 cells were simultaneously treated with OSCs and N-nitrosamines. The effect of NPYR was attenuated by about 61-67%, respectively, with the highest concentration of DAS (50 mu M) and DADS (5 pM). The protective effect of DADS (5 pM, 66%) was higher than DAS (50 mu M, 53%) towards NDMA-induced oxidative DNA damage. A concentration of 50 mu MDPS and 5 mu M DPDS led to a 65-63% and 59-65% reduction in NPYR/NDMA-induced oxidative DNA damage, respectively. Our results indicate that OSCs protect human-derived cells against the oxidative DNA damaging effect of NPYR and NDMA, two carcinogenic compounds which occur in the environment. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available