4.5 Article

Haplotype-based case-control study of the association between the guanylate cyclase activator 2B (GUCA2B, uroguanylin) gene and essential hypertension

Journal

HYPERTENSION RESEARCH
Volume 30, Issue 9, Pages 789-796

Publisher

JAPANESE SOC HYPERTENSION CENT ACADEMIC SOC, PUBL OFFICE
DOI: 10.1291/hypres.30.789

Keywords

haplotypes; guanylate cyclase activator 2B; single nucleotide polymorphism; association study; essential hypertension

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Uroguanylin (gene name: guanylate cyclase activator 2B, GUCA2B) is a peptide regulator of intestinal salt and water transport. It has been reported that the uroguanylin knockout mouse exhibits elevated blood pressure. Therefore, the GUCA2B gene is thought to be a susceptibility gene for essential hypertension (EH). Despite extensive studies, however, the relationship between the GUCA2B gene and EH has not yet been defined. The aim of this study was to assess the association between the human GUCA2B gene and EH. Using four single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), we conducted a genetic association study in 281 EH patients and 279 age-matched normotensive (NT1) individuals. To derive more reliable data, we performed a duplicate case-control study in which we recruited another normotensive group (NT2). There was no significant difference in the overall distribution of alleles for any of the SNPs between the EH and NT1 groups, or between the EH and NT2 groups. Therefore, these four SNPs cannot be the genetic markers for EH. The occurrences of the C-A haplotype (rs883062-rs1047047) and the C-A-G haplotype (rs883062-rs1047047-rs2297566) were significantly higher in the EH group than in the NT1 group (p<0.0001) or the NT2 group (p<0.0001). These results suggest that the C-A haplotype and the C-A-G haplotype of the GUCA2B gene are the genetic markers for EH, and that GUCA2B or a neighboring gene might be a susceptibility gene for EH.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available