4.6 Article

Characterisation of enamel white spot lesions using X-ray micro-tomography

Journal

JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY
Volume 35, Issue 9, Pages 737-743

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2007.06.001

Keywords

mineral density; micro-computed tomography; white spot lesion; enamel; caries; demineralisation; hydroxyapatite

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: The aim of this study was to characterise the mineral density (MD) of natural enamel white spot lesions (WSLs) using X-ray micro -tomography calibrated with different density hydroxyapatite phantoms. Methods: Seven natural WSLs from four extracted non-carious premolar teeth were scanned at a voxel size of 7.6 mu m using a desktop X-ray micro -tomography system. Five hydroxyapatite phantoms (sintered pellets of hydroxyapatite powder) with densities ranging from 1.52 to 3.14 g/cm(3) were used as calibration standards for each scan. Three-dimensional image reconstruction enabled MD gradients throughout the lesion to be quantified using an MD calibration equation derived from hydroxyapatite phantoms. Background noise generated during the measurement of MD was reduced using a Gaussian filter. Results: Gaussian filter reduced the signal-to-noise ratio (standard deviation) significantly while the basic MD information (average value) remained intact. The mineral gradients through the WSLs examined were compared and are discussed in terms of existing literature. The MD of sound enamel, apparent intact surface layer of WSL, and lowest level of WSL was found to be 2.65-2.89 g/crm(3), 2.23-2.58 g/cm(3) and 1.48-2.03 g/cm(3), respectively. Our MD results are comparable with other studies. Conclusions: X-ray micro -tomography is a sensitive in vitro technique capable of characterising and quantifying MD of small non-cavitated WSLs. This method has a promising potential for future carious and quantitative remineralisation studies. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available