4.4 Article

Absolute calibration and characterization of the multiband imaging photometer for spitzer.: I.: The stellar calibrator sample and the 24 μm calibration

Journal

PUBLICATIONS OF THE ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY OF THE PACIFIC
Volume 119, Issue 859, Pages 994-1018

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/521881

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present the stellar calibrator sample and the conversion from instrumental to physical units for the 24 mm channel of the Multiband Imaging Photometer for Spitzer (MIPS). The primary calibrators are A stars, and the calibration factor based on those stars is 4.54 x 10(-2) MJy sr(-1) (DN s(-1))(-1), with a nominal uncertainty of 2%. We discuss the data reduction procedures required to attain this accuracy; without these procedures, the calibration factor obtained using the automated pipeline at the Spitzer Science Center is lower. We 1.6% +/- 0.6% extend this work to predict 24 mu m flux densities for a sample of 238 stars that covers a larger range of flux densities and spectral types. We present a total of 348 measurements of 141 stars at 24 mm. This sample covers a factor of similar to 460 in 24 mm flux density, from 8.6 mJy up to 4.0 Jy. We show that the calibration is linear over that range with respect to target flux and background level. The calibration is based on observations made using 3 s exposures; a preliminary analysis shows that the calibration factor may be 1% and 2% lower for 10 and 30 s exposures, respectively. We also demonstrate that the calibration is very stable: over the course of the mission, repeated measurements of our routine calibrator, HD 159330, show a rms scatter of only 0.4%. Finally, we show that the point-spread function (PSF) is well measured and allows us to calibrate extended sources accurately; Infrared Astronomy Satellite (IRAS) and MIPS measurements of a sample of nearby galaxies are identical within the uncertainties.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available