4.6 Article

Clustering of long-term trends in metabolic syndrome variables from childhood to adulthood in blacks and whites - The Bogalusa Heart Study

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 166, Issue 5, Pages 527-533

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwm105

Keywords

insulin resistance; longitudinal studies; metabolic syndrome X; obesity

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL-38844] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIA NIH HHS [AG-16592] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NICHD NIH HHS [HD-047247] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Clustering of long-term rates of change in metabolic syndrome variables (body mass index, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance, ratio of triglycerides to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and mean arterial pressure) from childhood to adulthood was evaluated longitudinally (1982-2003) in a cohort of 389 Blacks and 631 Whites who were examined 3-6 times both as children (ages 4-17 years) and as adults (ages 18-38 years) over an average of 16 years (3,874 observations). The incremental area under the growth curve was used as a measure of long-term rates of change in risk variables since childhood. Intraclass correlations, a measure of the degree of clustering, among the four variables were significant (p < 0.001) for childhood, adulthood, and incremental area values and were higher in adulthood than in childhood. Blacks showed a higher degree of clustering of long-term rates of change in risk variables than did Whites. Adjustment for body mass index reduced the degree of clustering by approximately 50%. These results show that metabolic syndrome variables coexist in terms not only of their levels in childhood and adulthood but also of long-term rates of change. Obesity is of critical importance in the development of metabolic syndrome, and its prevention beginning in childhood needs to be addressed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available