4.7 Article

Force field modeling of amino acid conformational energies

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL THEORY AND COMPUTATION
Volume 3, Issue 5, Pages 1774-1788

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ct700082f

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The conformational degrees of freedom for four amino acids in a model peptide environment have been sampled with density functional and second-order Moller-Plesset methods. Geometries have been optimized with an augmented double-zeta basis set and relative energies estimated by extrapolation of results using double, triple, and quadruple-zeta basis sets and including higher order correlation effects. In addition, the effects of vibrational zero point energies and solvation have been considered. The density functional method is unable to locate all the minima found at the MP2 level, which most likely is due to the inability for describing dispersion interactions. The use of basis sets smaller than augmented polarized double-zeta with the MP2 method may also in some cases lead to artifacts. The effects on relative energies by enlarging the basis set beyond an augmented triple-zeta and including higher order correlation beyond MP2 is small. The MP2/aug-cc-pVTZ level is recommended as a level of theory capable of an accuracy of similar to 1 kJ/mol for relative conformational energies. Eight different force fields are tested for reproducing the electronic structure reference data. Force fields that represent the electrostatic energy by fixed partial charges typically only account for half of the conformations, while the AMOEBA force field, which includes multipole moments and polarizability, can reproduce similar to 80% of the conformations in terms of geometry. This not only suggests that multipole moments and polarizability are important factors in designing new force fields but also indicates that there is still room for improvements.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available