4.7 Article

The cosmic X-ray background and the population of the most heavily obscured agns

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 666, Issue 1, Pages 86-95

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/519985

Keywords

cosmology : observations; diffuse radiation; galaxies : active; X-rays : diffuse background; X-rays : general

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We report on an accurate measurement of the CXB in the 15-50 keV range performed with the Phoswich Detection System (PDS) instrument aboard the BeppoSAX satellite. We establish that the most likely CXB intensity level at its emission peak (26-28 keV) is approximate to 40 keV cm(-2) s(-1) sr(-1), a value consistent with that derived from the best available CXB measurement obtained over 25 years ago with the first High Energy Astronomical Observatory (HEAO-1) satellite mission (Gruber et al.), whose intensity, lying well below the extrapolation of some lower energy measurements performed with focusing telescopes, was questioned in recent years. We find that 90% of the acceptable solutions of our best-fit model to the PDS data give a 20-50 keV CXB flux lower than 6.5 x 10(-8) ergs cm(-2) s(-1) sr(-1), which is 12% higher than that quoted by Gruber et al. when we use our best calibration scale. In combination with the CXB synthesis models we infer that about 25% of the intensity at similar to 30 keV arises from extremely obscured, Compton-thick AGNs (absorbing column density N-H > 10(24) cm(-2)), while a much larger population would be implied by the highest intensity estimates. We also infer a mass density of supermassive black holes of similar to 3 x 10(5) M-circle dot Mpc(-3). The summed contribution of resolved sources (Moretti et al.) in the 2-10 keV band exceeds our best-fit CXB intensity extrapolated to lower energies, but it is within our upper limit, so that any significant contribution to the CXB from sources other than AGNs, such as star-forming galaxies and diffuse warm-hot intergalactic medium ( WHIM), is expected to be mainly confined below a few keV.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available