4.7 Article

Zoledronic acid and survival in breast cancer patients with bone Metastases and elevated markers of osteoclast activity

Journal

ONCOLOGIST
Volume 12, Issue 9, Pages 1035-1043

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.12-9-1035

Keywords

biologic markers; breast neoplasms; survival rate; zoledronic acid

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective. Most breast cancer patients with bone metastases will receive bisphosphonate treatment. This post hoc analysis investigated whether early normalization of urinary N-telopeptide of type I collagen (NTX) levels during bisphosphonate therapy correlates with a long-term reduction in skeletal-related event (SRE) risk and mortality in patients with breast cancer. Methods. This was a retrospective subset analysis of a phase III randomized trial comparing i.v. zoledronic acid with pamidronate treatment in patients with bone metastases from breast cancer or multiple myeloma. Patients with breast cancer who had NTX assessments at baseline and at months I and 3 (n = 342) were classified as normal (NTX < 64 nmol/mmol creatinine) or elevated (NTX :64 nmol/mmol creatinine). The relative risk for an SRE or death was estimated with Cox regression models. Results. Among the 328 evaluable patients treated with zoledronic acid, 196 patients (59.7%) had elevated baseline NTX, with 149 of those patients (76.0%) having normalized NTX levels and 31 patients (15.8%) having persistently elevated NTX levels at 3 months. The normalized NTX group had significantly lower risks for a first SRE, a first fracture or surgery to bone, or death than the group that had persistently elevated NTX levels. Conclusions. These results suggest that early normalization of elevated baseline NTX while receiving zoledronic acid is associated with longer event-free and overall survival times compared with persistently elevated NTX. Further analyses in cancer patients with elevated marker levels are warranted to confirm the implications of these findings.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available