4.7 Article

Phase 2 study of erlotinib in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

Journal

CANCER
Volume 110, Issue 5, Pages 1059-1067

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.22886

Keywords

EGFR; hepatoma; HCC; signal transduction; chemotherapy; hepatocellular; erlotinib

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND. Growth factor overexpression, including epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression, is common in hepatocellular cancers. Erlotimb is a receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor with specificity for EGFR. The primary objective of this study was to determine the proportion of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients treated with erlotimb who were alive and progression-free (PFS) at 16 weeks of continuous treatment. METHODS. Patients with unresectable FICC, no prior systemic therapy, performance status (PS) of 0, 1, or 2, and Childs-Pugh (CP) cirrhosis A or B received oral erlotinib 150 mg daily for 28-day cycles. Tumor response was assessed every 2 cycles by using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST; National Cancer Institute Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, Bethesda, Md) criteria. Patients accrued to either low or high EGFR expression cohorts; each colhort had stopping rules applied when there was a lack of efficacy. RESULTS. Forty FICC patients were enrolled. Median age was 64 years (range, 3383 years), sex distribution was 32 males and 8 females, performance scores were 40% PS 0, 55% PS 1, Childs-Pugh distribution was 75% A and 20% B. There were no complete or partial responses; however, 17 of 40 patients achieved stable disease at 16 weeks of continuous therapy. The PFS at 16 weeks was 43%, and the median overall survival (OS) was 43 weeks (10.75 months). No patients required dose reductions of eflotinib. No correlation between EGFR expression and outcome was found. CONCLUSIONS. Results of this study indicated that single-agent erlotimb is well tolerated and has modest disease-control benefit in HCC, manifested as modestly prolonged PFS and OS when compared with historical controls. Cancer 2007;110:1059-67. Published 2007American Cancer Society.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available