4.2 Article

Effects of motor preparation and spatial attention on corticospinal excitability in a delayed-response paradigm

Journal

EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH
Volume 182, Issue 1, Pages 125-129

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-007-1055-4

Keywords

movement preparation; spatial attention; delayed-response task; corticospinal excitability; tms; motor preparation; response preparation

Categories

Funding

  1. Economic and Social Research Council [RES-000-23-1571] Funding Source: researchfish
  2. Medical Research Council [G9806600] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. Medical Research Council [G9806600] Funding Source: Medline
  4. Wellcome Trust [076368/z/05/z] Funding Source: Medline
  5. ESRC [RES-000-23-1571] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. MRC [G9806600] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The preparation of motor responses during the delay period of an instructed delay task is associated with sustained neural firing in the primate premotor cortex. It remains unclear how and when such preparation-related premotor activity influences the motor output system. In this study, we tested modulation of corticospinal excitability using single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) during a delayed-response task. At the beginning of the delay interval participants were either provided with no information, spatial attentional information concerning location but not identity of an upcoming imperative stimulus, or information regarding the upcoming response. Behavioral data indicate that participants used all information available to them. Only when information concerning the upcoming response was provided did corticospinal excitability show differential modulation for the effector muscle compared to other task-unrelated muscles. We conclude that modulation of corticospinal excitability reflects specific response preparation, rather than non-specific event preparation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available