4.7 Article

MicroRNA expression distinguishes between germinal center B cell-like and activated B cell-like subtypes of diffuse large B cell lymphoma

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 121, Issue 5, Pages 1156-1161

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.22800

Keywords

microRNA; diffuse large B cell lymphoma; follicular center lymphoma; microarray; prognosis

Categories

Funding

  1. MRC [MC_U137973817] Funding Source: UKRI
  2. Medical Research Council [MC_U137973817] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. Medical Research Council [MC_U137973817] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is an aggressive malignancy that accounts for nearly 40% of all lymphoid tumors. This heterogeneous disease can be divided into germinal center B celllike (GCB) and activated B cell-like (ABC) subtypes by gene expression and immunhohistochemical profiling. Using microarray analysis on prototypic cell lines, we identified microRNAs (miR-155, miR-21 and miR-221) that were more highly expressed in ABC-type than GCB-type cell lines. These microRNAs were over-expressed in de novo DLBCL (n = 35), transformed DLBCL (n = 14) and follicular center lymphoma cases (n = 27) compared to normal B cells. Consistent with the cell line model, expression levels were higher in DLBCL cases with an ABC-type immunophenotype than those that were GCB-type (p < 0.05). Moreover, using multivariate analysis we found that expression of miR-21 was an independent prognostic indicator in de novo DLBCL (p < 0.05). Interestingly, expression levels of both miR155 and miR-21 were also higher in nonmalignant ABC than in GCB cells. As we also demonstrate that expression of microRNAs can be measured reliably from routine paraffin -embedded biopsies of more than 8-years-old (p < 0.001), we suggest that micro- RNAs could be clinically useful molecular markers for DLBCL as well as other cancers. (C) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available