Divergent compensatory growth responses within species: linked to contrasting migrations in salmon?

Animals often exhibit accelerated or compensatory growth (CG) after periods of environmentally induced growth depression, raising important questions about how they cope with environmental variability. We tested an underexplored hypothesis regarding the evolutionary consequences of CG; namely, that natural populations differ in CG responses. Common-garden experiments were used to compare subadult growth following food restriction between groups (control, treatment) of two Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) populations and their first-generation (F-1) hybrids. The populations are found at similar latitudes but characterized by differences in migration distance. We predicted that long-distance migrants would better maintain growth trajectories following food restriction than short-distance migrants because they: (1) require larger body sizes to offset energetic costs of migration and (2) face greater time constraints for growth as they must leave non-breeding areas earlier to return to breeding areas. Long-distance migrants grew faster, achieved quicker CG (relative to controls), and their overall body morphology was more streamlined (a trait known to improve swimming efficiency) than slower growing short-distance migrants. F-1 hybrids were generally intermediate in normal growth, CG, and body morphology. We concluded that CG responses may differ considerably among populations and that the conditions generating them are likely interconnected with selection on a suite of other traits.