4.4 Article

Scanning electron microscopy of fetal murine myelomeningocele reveals growth and development of the spinal cord in early gestation and neural tissue destruction around birth

Journal

JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY
Volume 42, Issue 9, Pages 1561-1565

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2007.04.019

Keywords

myelomeningocele; spina bifida; neural tube defect; fetal surgery

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Previous studies demonstrated that the spinal cord within a fetal myelomeningocele (MMC) lesion suffers progressive destruction during gestation. This study aims at elucidating this pathophysiologic feature on a cellular and ultrastructural level in a model of genetically determined MMC. Methods: Curly tail/loop tail mouse fetuses at various gestational stages and neonates were analyzed electron-microscopically to document time-point and nature of neural tissue development and pathologic alterations within the MMC. Results: At embryonic day (E) 8.5 and E9.5, round cells displaying multiple microvilli covered the entire region of interest, and some specimens showed initial stages of neurulation. At E 10.5, neurulation was terminated in normal animals, whereas the neural placode remained unfolded in MMC fetuses and became distinguishable from adjacent epidermal layers. At E15.5, an apparently normal differentiation was found. Until this time-point, there was no tissue damage or inflammation. Thereafter, increasingly severe tissue alterations were identified with ongoing gestation leading to almost complete loss of neural tissue at birth. Conclusion: We show here in fetal mice with MMC that, apart from absent neurulation, growth and development of the otherwise perfectly intact exposed spinal cord appear normal in early gestation, whereas later, the unprotected neural tissue is progressively destroyed. (c) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available